“XABI ALONSO’S DISASTROUS STRATEGY IS DESTROYING REAL MADRID! PACK YOUR BAGS AND LEAVE THE BERNABÉU IMMEDIATELY!” Luis de la Fuente’s words after today’s Clásico, in which Real Madrid fell to Barcelona, ​​resonated like a true earthquake in the world of football.

The defeat, with a score that reflected the tactical superiority of the culés, exposed obvious flaws in coach Xabi Alonso’s strategy, provoking an unprecedented wave of criticism and plunging the Bernabéu into a climate of suffocating tension.

The game began with a Real Madrid that seemed disconnected. The offensive movements, which usually characterize the white team, were disordered and predictable. Barcelona, ​​for its part, presented itself with a clear plan, executing high pressures and quick transitions that exploited every defensive error by the merengue team.

Every loss of the ball by Madrid was immediately punished, and the feeling of vulnerability was evident from the first minutes of the match.

Luis de la Fuente did not hold back when analyzing the situation. His statements were direct and forceful: he described Xabi Alonso’s strategy as “disastrous” and asked the coach to leave the Bernabéu immediately.

The forcefulness of his words generated an immediate debate on social networks and the media, dividing opinions between those who considered the criticism fair and those who saw it as an exaggerated and ill-timed attack.

The Classic was marked by moments of tension and plays that made the fans tremble. Barcelona took advantage of every disconnection by Madrid to create danger, and its most incisive players managed to unbalance the white defense again and again.

Madrid’s lines seemed disconnected; The pressure in the midfield did not work and the attacks were resolved with individuals, instead of the collective game that usually defines the team.

In the midst of the media storm, Jude Bellingham emerged as the voice of reason. The midfielder, aware of the wave of criticism and the impact of De la Fuente’s words, came out in defense of Xabi Alonso and the entire team.

Bellingham highlighted the commitment and dedication of his teammates, remembering that defeats are part of sport and that the internal unity of the group is key to overcoming difficult moments.

His intervention was measured but firm, and he sought to convey confidence to both the fans and his teammates in the locker room.

Despite Bellingham’s defense, the controversy around the coach intensifies. Analysts and commentators have pointed out that Xabi Alonso’s planning did not respond to the intensity and dynamic that Barcelona imposed from the beginning.

Tactical decisions, change management and adaptation to the rival strategy became the main points of criticism. The lack of adjustments during critical moments revealed a tactical flexibility problem that many consider worrying for the rest of the season.

The impact on team morale is another relevant aspect. A defeat in a match with as much impact as the Clásico inevitably generates additional pressure, and De la Fuente’s intervention has added fuel to a fire that threatens to affect the confidence of the players and coaching staff.

However, Bellingham’s defense seeks to counteract this pressure, reinforcing the need to maintain team cohesion and faith in Alonso’s long-term strategy.

From a tactical point of view, Madrid showed obvious shortcomings. The defense failed to contain Barcelona’s rapid transitions, and counterattacks were executed with little effectiveness. In attack, the dependence on individual plays decreased fluidity and the ability to surprise the opponent.

Even high-caliber players like Vinícius Júnior or Rodrygo could not compensate for the collective gaps that became evident throughout the 90 minutes.

The Bernabéu fans, present in the stadium and connected through social networks, reacted immediately.

Some supported de la Fuente’s statements, sharing frustration with tactical performance and demanding drastic changes; Others applauded Bellingham’s stance, highlighting the importance of maintaining locker room unity and not letting a loss define the perception of the season.

This division reflects the intensity and passion that surrounds Real Madrid, where every match, especially a Clásico, is analyzed in detail and every mistake amplified.

Xabi Alonso, for his part, maintained composure in his post-match statements. He avoided fueling controversy and focused on collective analysis, highlighting the positive aspects of the team and remembering that the season is still long and that the objectives are still achievable.

He stressed the importance of learning from mistakes and strengthening communication on the field and in the locker room, instead of being carried away by external pressure.

This Classic leaves important lessons. Beyond the result, it exposes the need for tactical adaptability, emotional management in the face of pressure and resilience of a team that seeks to consolidate itself as a leader in the season.

De la Fuente’s words and Bellingham’s defense are a reflection of a duality: harsh criticism versus the need for unity, extreme demand versus the team’s internal commitment.

In conclusion, Real Madrid’s defeat against Barcelona is not only reflected on the scoreboard, but has generated a deep debate about strategy, locker room management and the team’s ability to handle the pressure of high-caliber matches.

Between criticism, defense and tactical analysis, Xabi Alonso and his players must find a balance between learning from defeat and maintaining collective confidence, facing the next challenges with determination and cohesion so that the season is not compromised by a single match.