ÓSCAR DE LA HOYA ATTACKS CRAWFORD FOR ATTACKING THE WBC 🤯🔥

Óscar de la Hoya once again shook the boxing world with his strong statements against Terence Crawford, after the American champion publicly attacked the World Boxing Council (WBC). The historic promoter described Crawford’s attitude as childish, irresponsible and harmful to the sport.

The conflict began when Crawford, upset by the financial fines he had to pay after his million-dollar fight, insulted the WBC on his social networks. His incendiary words caused a great controversy, exposing the growing tension between boxers, organizations and promoters.

De la Hoya was quick to react, launching a direct message that quickly went viral. The former world champion stated that he was “very, very angry” with Crawford, ensuring that a boxer of his level and career should not behave so impulsively.

According to De la Hoya, the problem lies not only in the insults towards the organization, but also in Crawford’s refusal to pay the corresponding fines. For the promoter, this decision reflects a lack of respect towards those who work to keep the sport organized.

“Brother, you are over 30 years old! You have taken 50 million dollars!” De la Hoya exclaimed, emphasizing that elite athletes have a responsibility that goes beyond the ring. His message sought to remember that greatness is also demonstrated outside of fights.

One of the points that generated the most indignation in De La Hoya was the insinuation that Crawford would be acting as a spokesperson for TKO or Dana White’s agenda. The promoter expressed that this closeness could be influencing the boxer’s behavior.

De la Hoya defended the WBC, pointing out that the money collected through such fines has a noble purpose. According to him, these funds collaborate with a Foundation that helps thousands of children with the dream of becoming world boxing champions.

For the promoter, refusing to contribute to this social goal demonstrates a worrying disconnect between Crawford and the roots of the sport. He considered that this attitude tarnished his legacy, even more so at a time when boxing needs unity.

De la Hoya’s strong words were echoed in the boxing community, which has seen the division between organizations, promoters and fighters grow. Each new public dispute adds more tension to an industry already plagued by internal conflicts.

Several analysts pointed out that this scandal reflects the imbalance between the astronomical income of big stars and the ethical responsibilities that should accompany them. Crawford’s case has reopened debates about authority, justice and professionalism.

Meanwhile, fans of the American boxer came to his defense, arguing that sanctioning bodies often impose excessive fines and act in a non-transparent manner. To them, Crawford has only expressed legitimate frustration.

However, other fans agreed with De La Hoya, remembering that publicly insulting the WBC is not only inappropriate, but counterproductive. A champion must lead by example, even when he or she disagrees with management decisions.

The rift in boxing seems to grow deeper with each controversy. What were once internal discussions now become public spectacles that reveal the fragility of relationships between the most influential figures in sports.

The episode between De La Hoya and Crawford could mark a turning point in the dynamics of professional boxing. When two such big names collide, the repercussions often extend to promoters, organizations and fans alike.

For now, Crawford has not responded directly to the legendary promoter’s comments, but close sources say he is aware of the magnitude of the debate generated. His silence keeps the tension alive within the boxing environment.

The question many are asking is whether this conflict will affect future negotiations, rankings or sanctions within the WBC. Management decisions could influence Crawford’s future at various weight classes.

Óscar de la Hoya, for his part, continues to defend the values ​​that, according to him, should guide champions: respect, responsibility and commitment to the community. His statements have been interpreted as an urgent call for reflection.

With this controversy, boxing once again demonstrates itself as a sport where blows outside the ring can be as strong as those thrown in combat. Words, especially when they come from historical figures, leave deep marks.

The rift in boxing is becoming deeper and deeper, and this episode between two giants only confirms that the future of the sport will depend on how these clashes of egos, interests and worldviews are handled.

What is clear is that the conflict between De La Hoya and Crawford will continue to give people something to talk about. Fans hope that both can refocus their energies on strengthening the sport, instead of fueling divisions that contribute nothing to the growth of boxing.